View Post [edit]
Poster: | Not Allan | Date: | Aug 31, 2012 8:14am |
Forum: | web | Subject: | Re: robots.txt |
This post was modified by Not Allan on 2012-08-31 15:14:00
Reply [edit]
Poster: | jory2 | Date: | Aug 31, 2012 8:38am |
Forum: | web | Subject: | Re: robots.txt |
you say; "If the ownership of the site changes, what does that have to do with the historical record? Answer - nothing."
I don't think anyone would disagree with that.
What you failed to consider, and what is most important, was what the Rightful Owner(s) of the websites want.
Perhaps the "proper treatment" would have been for this website to have the consent and the legal permission of the Rightful owners in the first place.
Reply [edit]
Poster: | Not Allan | Date: | Aug 31, 2012 8:49am |
Forum: | web | Subject: | Re: robots.txt |
The issue here is historical integrity.
Reply [edit]
Poster: | jory2 | Date: | Aug 31, 2012 9:41am |
Forum: | web | Subject: | Re: robots.txt |
http://archive.org/about/terms.php
"The Archive does not endorse or sponsor any content in the Collections, nor does it guarantee or warrant that the content available in the Collections is accurate, complete, noninfringing, or legally accessible in your jurisdiction, and you agree that you are solely responsible for abiding by all laws and regulations that may be applicable to the viewing of the content. In addition, the Collections are provided to you on an as-is and as-available basis."
I agree 100% with the statement "the issue here is historical integrity." unfortunately this website has absolutely none.
You say; "If the archive finds itself publishing material that is copyrighted"
If?, what do you mean if? I know of zero websites old enough to be in the "public domain" void of Copyright.
You?
Reply [edit]
Poster: | Not Allan | Date: | Aug 31, 2012 10:42am |
Forum: | web | Subject: | Re: robots.txt |
I don't understand this. Why not? Isn't the purpose of this website to archive the internet, so, why not just do it, with the disclaimers in the terms you have noted?
Also, the 'new owners' are not owners of the earlier web site, they are the new owners of the web site name, that's all. I don't know their motives for blacking out the site with robots.txt, but I suspect that they are not honorable. Why should they be catered to?
Reply [edit]
Poster: | jory2 | Date: | Aug 31, 2012 10:55am |
Forum: | web | Subject: | Re: robots.txt |
I don't think you understand even the basics of copyright laws so there's no point in this discussion; for me anyway.
Take care!
Reply [edit]
Poster: | andy forester | Date: | Feb 10, 2013 1:07pm |
Forum: | web | Subject: | Re: robots.txt |
Reply [edit]
Poster: | PDpolice | Date: | Aug 31, 2012 2:12pm |
Forum: | web | Subject: | Re: robots.txt |
Please lay out a more thorough argument for the proper treatment of a web page which has had ownership changes. And if you can address the problem of personal information being archived it would help.
Reply [edit]
Poster: | Not Allan | Date: | Aug 31, 2012 9:07pm |
Forum: | web | Subject: | Re: robots.txt |
This post was modified by Not Allan on 2012-08-31 21:46:57
This post was modified by Not Allan on 2012-08-31 21:49:36
This post was modified by Not Allan on 2012-08-31 21:50:24
This post was modified by Not Allan on 2012-09-01 04:07:05
Reply [edit]
Poster: | daffaela | Date: | Nov 15, 2013 11:44pm |
Forum: | web | Subject: | Re: robots.txt |
Great info Thanks
Alfaonline.com Toko belanja online murah Promo heboh jual barang hanya Rp 1 - Toko belanja online murah - Alfaonline.com